Pros:
1.) I found the CG to be quite interesting for one reason: the film takes place in a video game, so unless there are some terrible CG that are not purposefully made (i.e., 8-bit characters in a realistic gaming world), any decent or bad CG fits well into this film. They are not groundbreaking, but the CG crew has an advantage when it comes to making them in a video game environment. Not really a big deal, but it something worth pointing out despite being a inane pro.
2.) The film establishes well on what is the real world and the video game world. As I mentioned with the CG, the video game world does not look that real yet it fits into it anyway whereas the real world is…the real world; no CG at all. Not only does the video game world (or Free City as it is called) look dissimilar to our own, but how the people live in that world is interesting. They are NPCs who act naturally to all the crime and chaos that is happening thanks to the video game players which not only makes it pretty funny, but we also get to see some Easter eggs from certain game glitches to references of other popular films and games. Think of this film as The Lego Movie but with video games, and you get the idea of what the world is like.
3.) If there is one actor that I think stands out easily, it is Taika Waititi as Antwan. While he may not be in it much and he is kind of cliché, he is so over-the-top bossy and greedy that he makes Ryan Reynolds look like his Deadpool character in X-Men Origins: Wolverine. That may not be the best way to compare Reynolds’s character, but he is similar to what Will Ferrell did as Lord Business in The Lego Movie against Chris Pratt as Emmet Brickowski; one has more charm than the other. It is also clear that Taika is having fun with his role and enjoying being a douchebag boss who probably represents greedy video game corporations like EA or Activision Blizzard. The rest of the cast did fine, but Taika Waititi is the best actor in the film.
Cons:
1.) While Ryan Reynolds as Guy had a decent character arc, I found that two of the other major characters, Millie Rusk (played by Jodie Comer) and Walter “Keys” McKeys (Joe Keery), to be more interesting. They have as much screen time as Guy, and I kind of wonder if the film is trying to balance these three characters despite the fact that Guy is supposed to be the main character. I understand that Guy’s existence and motivation is thanks to those two, but their character arcs are more interesting than Guy’s, because they conflict with the main antagonist, Antwan. Maybe they could have written Guy better, but as it stands, Millie and Keys are more investing than the main character.
2.) The first act has a rough start not because it introduces the world poorly, but it introduces it so casually that it made the world look kind of boring. There are plenty of movies that take place in a world that is like a video game (i.e., Ready Player One), and this film just made it look like nothing new is happening compared to the other movies. Also, there are some sloppy exposition and uninteresting moments. Not a great start, but it is made up with the rest of the film.
3.) The last act can be a bit ridiculous for a couple of reasons. One: it delves into some programming issues in Free City, and how they are resolved I am sure that video game programmers will tell you that is not how it works. Two: the film establishes that Free City is a popular video game, but it is kind of odd that the entire world is suddenly invested on what is happening to that game and Guy himself. Grand Theft Auto V is a popular video game, but not to the point where the entire world is that invested or interested in that game. It does not ruin the story, but it is ludicrous enough to bring some people out of the film.
Overall:
A film that was delayed thanks to a certain pandemic, Free Guy is a film that I describe (and I am sure everyone will say the same thing) as The Lego Movie but with video games. If you liked The Lego Movie and you are a fan of video games (and even if you are not a fan of either one), there is plenty to like about this film. It may be better than Ready Player One (a movie that I liked when I watched it, but I have not seen since it was released in theaters), and it may have similar elements to The Lego Movie, but this film still does its own thing with a few flaws here and there. It is a film that Ready Player One should have been, and it is certainly a film that is great to watch.
7/10